mercredi 22 avril 2015

100 reasons why climate change is natural


HERE are the 100 reasons, released in a dossier issued by the European Foundation, why climate change is natural and not man-made:

By CHARLOTTE MEREDITH
00:00, Tue, Nov 20, 2012


1) There is “no real scientific proof” that the current warming is caused by the rise of greenhouse gases from man’s activity.

2) Man-made carbon dioxide emissions throughout human history constitute less than 0.00022 percent of the total naturally emitted from the mantle of the earth during geological history.

3) Warmer periods of the Earth’s history came around 800 years before rises in CO2 levels.

4) After World War II, there was a huge surge in recorded CO2 emissions but global temperatures fell for four decades after 1940.


After World War II, there was a huge surge in recorded CO2 emissions

5) Throughout the Earth’s history, temperatures have often been warmer than now and CO2 levels have often been higher – more than ten times as high.

6) Significant changes in climate have continually occurred throughout geologic time.

7) The 0.7C increase in the average global temperature over the last hundred years is entirely consistent with well-established, long-term, natural climate trends.

8) The IPCC theory is driven by just 60 scientists and favourable reviewers not the 4,000 usually cited.

9) Leaked e-mails from British climate scientists – in a scandal known as “Climate-gate” - suggest that that has been manipulated to exaggerate global warming

10) A large body of scientific research suggests that the sun is responsible for the greater share of climate change during the past hundred years.

11) Politicians and activiists claim rising sea levels are a direct cause of global warming but sea levels rates have been increasing steadily since the last ice age 10,000 ago

12) Philip Stott, Emeritus Professor of Biogeography at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London says climate change is too complicated to be caused by just one factor, whether CO2 or clouds

13) Peter Lilley MP said last month that “fewer people in Britain than in any other country believe in the importance of global warming. That is despite the fact that our Government and our political class—predominantly—are more committed to it than their counterparts in any other country in the world”.

14) In pursuit of the global warming rhetoric, wind farms will do very little to nothing to reduce CO2 emissions

15) Professor Plimer, Professor of Geology and Earth Sciences at the University of Adelaide, stated that the idea of taking a single trace gas in the atmosphere, accusing it and finding it guilty of total responsibility for climate change, is an “absurdity”

16) A Harvard University astrophysicist and geophysicist, Willie Soon, said he is “embarrassed and puzzled” by the shallow science in papers that support the proposition that the earth faces a climate crisis caused by global warming.

17) The science of what determines the earth’s temperature is in fact far from settled or understood.

18) Despite activist concerns over CO2 levels, CO2 is a minor greenhouse gas, unlike water vapour which is tied to climate concerns, and which we can’t even pretend to control

19) A petition by scientists trying to tell the world that the political and media portrayal of global warming is false was put forward in the Heidelberg Appeal in 1992. Today, more than 4,000 signatories, including 72 Nobel Prize winners, from 106 countries have signed it.

20) It is claimed the average global temperature increased at a dangerously fast rate in the 20th century but the recent rate of average global temperature rise has been between 1 and 2 degrees C per century - within natural rates

21) Professor Zbigniew Jaworowski, Chairman of the Scientific Council of the Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection in Warsaw, Poland says the earth’s temperature has more to do with cloud cover and water vapor than CO2 concentration in the atmosphere.

22) There is strong evidence from solar studies which suggests that the Earth’s current temperature stasis will be followed by climatic cooling over the next few decades

23) It is myth that receding glaciers are proof of global warming as glaciers have been receding and growing cyclically for many centuries

24) It is a falsehood that the earth’s poles are warming because that is natural variation and while the western Arctic may be getting somewhat warmer we also see that the Eastern Arctic and Greenland are getting colder

25) The IPCC claims climate driven “impacts on biodiversity are significant and of key relevance” but those claims are simply not supported by scientific research

26) The IPCC threat of climate change to the world’s species does not make sense as wild species are at least one million years old, which means they have all been through hundreds of climate cycles

27) Research goes strongly against claims that CO2-induced global warming would cause catastrophic disintegration of the Greenland and Antarctic Ice Sheets.

28) Despite activist concerns over CO2 levels, rising CO2 levels are our best hope of raising crop yields to feed an ever-growing population

29) The biggest climate change ever experienced on earth took place around 700 million years ago

30) The slight increase in temperature which has been observed since 1900 is entirely consistent with well-established, long-term natural climate cycles

31) Despite activist concerns over CO2 levels, rising CO2 levels of some so-called “greenhouse gases” may be contributing to higher oxygen levels and global cooling, not warming

32) Accurate satellite, balloon and mountain top observations made over the last three decades have not shown any significant change in the long term rate of increase in global temperatures

33) Today’s CO2 concentration of around 385 ppm is very low compared to most of the earth’s history – we actually live in a carbon-deficient atmosphere

34) It is a myth that CO2 is the most common greenhouse gas because greenhouse gases form about 3% of the atmosphere by volume, and CO2 constitutes about 0.037% of the atmosphere

35) It is a myth that computer models verify that CO2 increases will cause significant global warming because computer models can be made to “verify” anything

36) There is no scientific or statistical evidence whatsoever that global warming will cause more storms and other weather extremes

37) One statement deleted from a UN report in 1996 stated that “none of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can attribute the observed climate changes to increases in greenhouse gases”

38) The world “warmed” by 0.07 +/- 0.07 degrees C from 1999 to 2008, not the 0.20 degrees C expected by the IPCC

39) The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says “it is likely that future tropical cyclones (typhoons and hurricanes) will become more intense” but there has been no increase in the intensity or frequency of tropical cyclones globally

40) Rising CO2 levels in the atmosphere can be shown not only to have a negligible effect on the Earth’s many ecosystems, but in some cases to be a positive help to many organisms

41) Researchers who compare and contrast climate change impact on civilizations found warm periods are beneficial to mankind and cold periods harmful

42) The Met Office asserts we are in the hottest decade since records began but this is precisely what the world should expect if the climate is cyclical

43) Rising CO2 levels increase plant growth and make plants more resistant to drought and pests

44) The historical increase in the air’s CO2 content has improved human nutrition by raising crop yields during the past 150 years

45) The increase of the air’s CO2 content has probably helped lengthen human lifespans since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution

46) The IPCC alleges that “climate change currently contributes to the global burden of disease and premature deaths” but the evidence shows that higher temperatures and rising CO2 levels has helped global populations

47) In May of 2004, the Russian Academy of Sciences published a report concluding that the Kyoto Protocol has no scientific grounding at all.

48) The “Climate-gate” scandal pointed to a expensive public campaign of disinformation and the denigration of scientists who opposed the belief that CO2 emissions were causing climate change

49) The head of Britain’s climate change watchdog has predicted households will need to spend up to £15,000 on a full energy efficiency makeover if the Government is to meet its ambitious targets for cutting carbon emissions.

50) Wind power is unlikely to be the answer to our energy needs. The wind power industry argues that there are “no direct subsidies” but it involves a total subsidy of as much as £60 per MWh which falls directly on electricity consumers. This burden will grow in line with attempts to achieve Wind power targets, according to a recent OFGEM report.

51) Wind farms are not an efficient way to produce energy. The British Wind Energy Association (BWEA) accepts a figure of 75 per cent back-up power is required.

52) Global temperatures are below the low end of IPCC predictions not at “at the top end of IPCC estimates”

53) Climate alarmists have raised the concern over acidification of the oceans but Tom Segalstad from Oslo University in Norway , and others, have noted that the composition of ocean water – including CO2, calcium, and water – can act as a buffering agent in the acidification of the oceans.

54) The UN’s IPCC computer models of human-caused global warming predict the emergence of a “hotspot” in the upper troposphere over the tropics.  Former researcher in the Australian Department of Climate Change, David Evans, said there is no evidence of such a hotspot

55) The argument that climate change is a of result of global warming caused by human activity is the argument of flat Earthers. 

56) The manner in which US President Barack Obama sidestepped Congress to order emission cuts shows how undemocratic and irrational the entire international decision-making process has become with regards to emission-target setting.

57) William Kininmonth, a former head of the National Climate Centre and a consultant to the World Meteorological Organisation, wrote “the likely extent of global temperature rise from a doubling of CO2 is less than 1C. Such warming is well within the envelope of variation experienced during the past 10,000 years and insignificant in the context of glacial cycles during the past million years, when Earth has been predominantly very cold and covered by extensive ice sheets.”

58) Canada has shown the world targets derived from the existing Kyoto commitments were always unrealistic and did not work for the country.

59) In the lead up to the Copenhagen summit, David Davis MP said of previous climate summits, at Rio de Janeiro in 1992 and Kyoto in 1997 that many had promised greater cuts, but “neither happened”, but we are continuing along the same lines.

60) The UK ’s environmental policy has a long-term price tag of about £55 billion, before taking into account the impact on its economic growth.

61) The UN’s panel on climate change warned that Himalayan glaciers could melt to a fifth of current levels by 2035. J. Graham Cogley a professor at Ontario Trent University, claims this inaccurate stating the UN authors got the date from an earlier report wrong by more than 300 years.

62) Under existing Kyoto obligations the EU has attempted to claim success, while actually increasing emissions by 13 per cent, according to Lord Lawson. In addition the EU has pursued this scheme by purchasing “offsets” from countries such as China paying them billions of dollars to destroy atmospheric pollutants, such as CFC-23, which were manufactured purely in order to be destroyed.

63) It is claimed that the average global temperature was relatively unchanging in pre-industrial times but sky-rocketed since 1900, and will increase by several degrees more over the next 100 years according to Penn State University researcher Michael Mann. There is no convincing empirical evidence that past climate was unchanging, nor that 20th century changes in average global temperature were unusual or unnatural.

64) Michael Mann of Penn State University has actually shown that the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age did in fact exist, which contrasts with his earlier work which produced the “hockey stick graph” which showed a constant temperature over the past thousand years or so followed by a recent dramatic upturn.

65) The globe’s current approach to climate change in which major industrialised countries agree to nonsensical targets for their CO2 emissions by a given date, as it has been under the Kyoto system, is very expensive.

66) The “Climate-gate” scandal revealed that a scientific team had emailed one another about using a “trick” for the sake of concealing a “decline” in temperatures when looking at the history of the Earth’s temperature.

67) Global temperatures have not risen in any statistically-significant sense for 15 years and have actually been falling for nine years. The “Climate-gate” scandal revealed a scientific team had expressed dismay at the fact global warming was contrary to their predictions and admitted their inability to explain it was “a travesty”.

68) The IPCC predicts that a warmer planet will lead to more extreme weather, including drought, flooding, storms, snow, and wildfires. But over the last century, during which the IPCC claims the world experienced more rapid warming than any time in the past two millennia, the world did not experience significantly greater trends in any of these extreme weather events.

69) In explaining the average temperature standstill we are currently experiencing, the Met Office Hadley Centre ran a series of computer climate predictions and found in many of the computer runs there were decade-long standstills but none for 15 years – so it expects global warming to resume swiftly.

70) Richard Lindzen, Professor of Atmospheric Sciences at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, wrote: “The notion of a static, unchanging climate is foreign to the history of the Earth or any other planet with a fluid envelope.  Such hysteria (over global warming) simply represents the scientific illiteracy of much of the public, the susceptibility of the public to the substitution of repetition for truth.”

71) Despite the 1997 Kyoto Protocol’s status as the flagship of the fight against climate change it has been a failure.

72) The first phase of the EU’s Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), which ran from 2005 to 2007 was a failure. Huge over-allocation of permits to pollute led to a collapse in the price of carbon from €33 to just €0.20 per tonne meaning the system did not reduce emissions at all.

73) The EU trading scheme, to manage carbon emissions has completely failed and actually allows European businesses to duck out of making their emissions reductions at home by offsetting, which means paying for cuts to be made overseas instead.

74) To date “cap and trade” carbon markets have done almost nothing to reduce emissions.

75) In the United States , the cap-and-trade is an approach designed to control carbon emissions and will impose huge costs upon American citizens via a carbon tax on all goods and services produced in the United States. The average family of four can expect to pay an additional $1700, or £1,043, more each year. It is predicted that the United States will lose more than 2 million jobs as the result of cap-and-trade schemes.

76) Dr Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, has indicated that out of the 21 climate models tracked by the IPCC the differences in warming exhibited by those models is mostly the result of different strengths of positive cloud feedback – and that increasing CO2 is insufficient to explain global-average warming in the last 50 to 100 years.

77) Why should politicians devote our scarce resources in a globally competitive world to a false and ill-defined problem, while ignoring the real problems the entire planet faces, such as: poverty, hunger, disease or terrorism.

78) A proper analysis of ice core records from the past 650,000 years demonstrates that temperature increases have come before, and not resulted from, increases in CO2 by hundreds of years.

79) Since the cause of global warming is mostly natural, then there is in actual fact very little we can do about it. (We are still not able to control the sun).

80) A substantial number of the panel of 2,500 climate scientists on the United Nation’s International Panel on Climate Change, which created a statement on scientific unanimity on climate change and man-made global warming, were found to have serious concerns.

81) The UK’s Met Office has been forced this year to re-examine 160 years of temperature data after admitting that public confidence in the science on man-made global warming has been shattered by revelations about the data.

82)  Politicians and activists push for renewable energy sources such as wind turbines under the rhetoric of climate change, but it is essentially about money – under the system of Renewable Obligations. Much of the money is paid for by consumers in electricity bills. It amounts to £1 billion a year.

83) The “Climate-gate” scandal revealed that a scientific team had tampered with their own data so as to conceal inconsistencies and errors. 

84) The “Climate-gate” scandal revealed that a scientific team had campaigned for the removal of a learned journal’s editor, solely because he did not share their willingness to debase science for political purposes.

85) Ice-core data clearly show that temperatures change centuries before concentrations of atmospheric CO2 change. Thus, there appears to be little evidence for insisting that changes in concentrations of CO2 are the cause of past temperature and climate change.

86) There are no experimentally verified processes explaining how CO2 concentrations can fall in a few centuries without falling temperatures – in fact it is changing temperatures which cause changes in CO2 concentrations, which is consistent with experiments that show CO2 is the atmospheric gas most readily absorbed by water.

87) The Government’s Renewable Energy Strategy contains a massive increase in electricity generation by wind power costing around £4 billion a year over the next twenty years. The benefits will be only £4 to £5 billion overall (not per annum). So costs will outnumber benefits by a range of between eleven and seventeen times.

88) Whilst CO2 levels have indeed changed for various reasons, human and otherwise, just as they have throughout history, the CO2 content of the atmosphere has increased since the beginning of the industrial revolution, and the growth rate has now been constant for the past 25 years.

89) It is a myth that CO2 is a pollutant, because nitrogen forms 80% of our atmosphere and human beings could not live in 100% nitrogen either: CO2 is no more a pollutant than nitrogen is and CO2 is essential to life.

90) Politicians and climate activists make claims to rising sea levels but certain members in the IPCC chose an area to measure in Hong Kong that is subsiding. They used the record reading of 2.3 mm per year rise of sea level.

91) The accepted global average temperature statistics used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change show that no ground-based warming has occurred since 1998.

92) If one factors in non-greenhouse influences such as El Nino events and large volcanic eruptions, lower atmosphere satellite-based temperature measurements show little, if any, global warming since 1979, a period over which atmospheric CO2 has increased by 55 ppm (17 per cent).

93) US President Barack Obama pledged to cut emissions by 2050 to equal those of 1910 when there were 92 million Americans. In 2050, there will be 420 million Americans, so Obama’s promise means that emissions per head will be approximately what they were in 1875. It simply will not happen.

94) The European Union has already agreed to cut emissions by 20 percent to 2020, compared with 1990 levels, and is willing to increase the target to 30 percent. However, these are unachievable and the EU has already massively failed with its Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), as EU emissions actually rose by 0.8 percent from 2005 to 2006 and are known to be well above the Kyoto goal.

95) Australia has stated it wants to slash greenhouse emissions by up to 25 percent below 2000 levels by 2020, but the pledges were so unpopular that the country’s Senate has voted against the carbon trading Bill, and the Opposition’s Party leader has now been ousted by a climate change sceptic.

96) Canada plans to reduce emissions by 20 percent compared with 2006 levels by 2020, representing approximately a 3 percent cut from 1990 levels but it simultaneously defends its Alberta tar sands emissions and its record as one of the world’s highest per-capita emissions setters.

97) India plans to reduce the ratio of emissions to production by 20-25 percent compared with 2005 levels by 2020, but all Government officials insist that since India has to grow for its development and poverty alleviation, it has to emit, because the economy is driven by carbon.

98) The Leipzig Declaration in 1996, was signed by 110 scientists who said: “We – along with many of our fellow citizens – are apprehensive about the climate treaty conference scheduled for Kyoto, Japan, in December 1997” and “based on all the evidence available to us, we cannot subscribe to the politically inspired world view that envisages climate catastrophes and calls for hasty actions.”

99) A US Oregon Petition Project stated “We urge the United States government to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December, 1997, and any other similar proposals. The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind. There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of CO2, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate.”

100) A report by the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change concluded “We find no support for the IPCC’s claim that climate observations during the twentieth century are either unprecedented or provide evidence of an anthropogenic effect on climate.”


Yannick Gagné
Libre@penseur
22 avril 2015


jeudi 29 janvier 2015

La fable de Labeaume...



Une Québec vit un Montréal,
qui lui sembla de belle taille.

Elle qui n’était pas grosse en tout comme un œuf, envieuse s’étend, et s’enfle et se travaille, pour égaler l’animal en grosseur;

Disant : Regardez bien, ma sœur, est-ce assez ? dites-moi ? n’y suis-je point encore ? Nenni.

M’y voici donc ? Point du tout.

M’y voilà ? Vous n’en approchez point.

La chétive pécore s’enfla si bien qu’elle creva.

Le monde est plein de gens qui ne sont pas plus sages :
Tout Bourgeois veut bâtir comme les grands Seigneurs;
Tout petit Prince a des Ambassadeurs;
Tout Marquis veut avoir des Pages.

Yannick Gagné
Libre@penseur
29 janvier 2015

mardi 22 juillet 2014

Lucidité

«Nous ne devons pas entretenir l'illusion que l'État crée la croissance. (...) Nous pouvons faire trois choses pour la favoriser. Des réformes structurelles d'un point de vue national, libéraliser le marché intérieur européen, et promouvoir le libre-échange au niveau mondial. Mais ce n'est pas moi Premier ministre qui peux générer de la croissance dans ce pays»

- Alexander Stubb, PM de la Finlande

Yannick Gagné
Libre@penseur
22 juillet 2014


Posted via Blogaway

samedi 19 avril 2014

Le mépris et la bêtise

"Vous êtes avec nous ou vous êtes contre nous"

Je me souviens de cette phrase, de George W. Bush, qui avait soulevé l'ire de nos bons péquistes.

Mais que disait vraiment cette phrase, au juste?

Nous exigeons votre appui.

Votre opinion est tellement importante à nos yeux, que si elle ne va pas dans le même sens que la nôtre, nous considérerons que vous vous opposez à nous; que vous nous êtes hostiles.

Cette phrase, quoique menaçante, fait l'admission suivante: Nous ne nous poserons pas davantage de questions; nous ne prendrons pas la peine de comprendre ou de faire d'investigation; nous allons vous attribuer arbitrairement une intention, et ce, même si nous sommes conscient que ce raisonnement est simpliste.

Dans ce cas de figure, on reconnaît qu'il est fort possible que les autres ne pensent pas comme nous; qu'ils aient une opinion divergente de la nôtre.

On reconnaît l'intelligence de l'autre, toutefois, on exige sa solidarité ou son adhésion.

****

"Si vous n'êtes pas d'accord avec nous, alors vous n'avez rien compris"

Voici la phrase des péquistes.

Donne-t-elle de l'importance à l'opinion de ses adversaires?

Respecte-t-elle l'intelligence de ses adversaires?

Exige-t-elle, des autres, un appui?

Contient-elle l'admission d'un quelconque raccourci intellectuel?

La réponse à toutes ces questions est NON.

Dans cette phrase, il n'y a que le mépris et la bêtise.

Un profond mépris de l'opinion des autres et la bêtise de l'illuminé.

Mais, dites-moi cher péquistes, pourquoi diable voulez-vous faire un pays avec des gens que vous méprisez tant?

Finalement, Georges W. Bush - le grand Satan des péquistes - était peut-être ferme et directif, toutefois, il n'arrive pas à la cheville des péquistes en ce qui concerne le mépris d'autrui et la bêtise.

Yannick Gagné
Libre@penseur
10 avril 2014


Posted via Blogaway

samedi 5 avril 2014

Le bien et le mal de la Charte

Ce qu'il y a de bien avec la Charte, c'est qu'on a pu identifier les xénophobes qui nous entourent.

Ce qu'il y a de mal avec la Charte, c'est qu'on a pu identifier les xénophobes qui nous entourent...

Yannick Gagné
Libre@penseur
5 avril 2014


Posted via Blogaway

GIEC : une dose de pragmatisme sur les révélations du nouveau rapport

CONTREPOINTS Tous droits réservés

Par Anthony Watts, le 3 avril 2014 dans Environnement

Anthony Watts revient sur le dernier article de Matt Ridley paru dans le Wall Street Journal, « Prévisions climatiques : couper les sonnettes d’alarmes ».

Par Anthony Watts, depuis les États-Unis.

Matt Ridley dans un article du Wall Street Journal du 27.03.2014 :

Alors même qu’il exagère sur la quantité de réchauffement, le GIEC prend de plus en plus de précautions quant à ses effets.

Le Groupe d’Experts Intergouvernementaux sur l’Évolution du Climat (GIEC) des Nations-Unies publiera bientôt la seconde partie de son récent rapport sur l’impact potentiel du changement climatique. Les représentants du gouvernement vont rencontrer les scientifiques au Japon afin de rendre sexy -– passez-moi l’expression — un résumé des décomptes des tempêtes, sécheresses et maladies à venir.

Mais le véritable rapport, appelé AR5-WGII, est bien moins effrayant que son prédécesseur de 7 ans auparavant.

Le rapport de 2007 était criblé d’erreurs concernant les glaciers himalayens, la forêt amazonienne, l’agriculture africaine, la pénurie d’eau et autres sujets, tous pointant, à tort, le côté urgent de la situation. Cela a conduit à une remise en question des procédés d’écriture du rapport par un conseil d’Académies des Science nationales, dont les recommandations de certaines ont été tout simplement ignorées.

D’autres, en revanche, ont fait mouche. Selon des fuites, le rapport est cette fois-ci bien plus prudent et vague concernant l’aggravation des cyclones, des changements de précipitations, des réfugiés du changement climatique ainsi que le coût global du réchauffement climatique.

Il place désormais le coût total à moins de 2% du PIB pour une hausse des températures de 2,5° Centigrade (ou 4,5° Fahrenheit) pour ce siècle. C’est bien moins que la prédiction proférée par Lord Stern qui annonçait que le changement climatique coûterait 5 à 20% du PIB mondial dans son rapport de 2006 pour le gouvernement britannique.

(Source : WUWT report about Stern who gets asked some tough questions by Australia’s ABC)

[…] Dans la science du climat, le réel débat n’a jamais été entre les « sceptiques » et les autres mais entre les « tièdes », qui pensent qu’un changement climatique anthropique est réel mais relativement inoffensif, et ceux qui pensent que le futur est inquiétant. Des scientifiques tels que Judith Curry de l’Institut Technologique de Géorgie et Richard Lindzen du MIT se sont nettement rapprochés du mouvement des « tièdes » ces dernières années.

Même avec ses hypothèses trop hautes et trop rapides, le brouillon du rapport du GIEC ayant récemment fuité explique clairement que lorsqu’il s’agit des effets sur les ressources humaines, « pour la plupart des secteurs économiques, l’impact du changement climatique sera peu important en comparaison avec les impacts d’autres causes » tels que la croissance économique et technologique, pour le reste de ce siècle. Si la température change d’environ 1° Centigrade entre aujourd’hui et 2090, comme le calcule M. Lewis, alors l’effet sera encore plus insignifiant.

En effet, un réchauffement infime réparti sur une longue période provoquera, d’après de nombreux experts, de nettes améliorations au bien-être humain. Des études telles que celle conduite par l’économiste et auteur du GIEC Richard Tol, professeur de l’Université du Sussex en Grande-Bretagne, démontrent que le réchauffement mondial en est certainement déjà responsable. Les personnes peuvent s’adapter à de tels changements – ce qui signifie essentiellement en engranger les bénéfices et en minimiser les dommages. Les satellites ont enregistré une hausse générale de 14% des régions vertes de la planète sur les 30 dernières années, dans tout type d’écosystème, en partie de par les émissions de CO2 de l’homme, qui permet aux plantes de pousser plus vite et en utilisant moins d’eau.

Commentaire d’Anthony Watts :

L’article complet est ici et ma partie préférée est la suivante :

« Presque toute peur liée à l’environnement mondial du dernier demi-siècle a été démontrée comme exagérée y compris « l’explosion » démographique, les pesticides, les pluies acides, le trou de la couche d’ozone, la dégradation du sperme, les cultures génétiquement modifiées et les abeilles tueuses. Dans chaque cas, les scientifiques institutionnels ont obtenu d’importants financements grâce à cette peur et ont silencieusement convergé vers le point de vue que le problème était bien plus modéré que la catastrophe extrême prédite. Le réchauffement climatique n’est pas différent. »

En effet, nombre d’alarmismes environnementaux sont devenus obsolètes, et pourtant nous revoilà à observer des personnes paniquer à nouveau sur le sujet, et avec un réchauffement planétaire en gros qui ne coopère pas tel que prévu, ils commencent à voir des croque-mitaines du climat dans chaque évènement météorologique. Il semblerait que les craintes moyennâgeuses du  »ciel qui nous tombe sur la tête » soient revenues dans les mentalités de quelques penseurs irrationnels.

Ce petit fait en revanche est l’argument incontournable contre les inquiétudes :

« Il place désormais le coût total à moins de 2% du PIB pour une hausse des températures de 2,5° Centigrade (ou 4,5° Farenheit) pour ce siècle. »

Retenez bien ceci : James Delingpole écrit :

« Des rapports précédents – et surtout le très influent Stern Review de 2006 – ont  établi les coûts occasionnés à l’économie mondiale par le « changement climatique » entre 5 et 20% du PIB mondial. »

Mais les dernières estimations, publiées par le Groupe de Travail II du Cinquième Rapport d’Évaluation du GIEC, explique qu’une hausse de 2,5 degrés Celsius dans les températures mondiales d’ici à la fin de siècle aura un coût sur l’économie mondial qui représentera entre 0,2 et 2% de son PIB. Si l’estimation la plus faible est juste, cela ne prendrait qu’un taux de croissance annuel de 2,4% (on en est aujourd’hui à environ 3%) pour que les coûts économiques du changement climatique soient effacés en un mois.

Aïe.

Game Over pour les alarmistes du climat. www.contrepoints.org 

Posted via Blogaway


Posted via Blogaway

Tout ça pour ça

LYSIANE GAGNON
LA PRESSE

Tout ça pour ça ? Huit mois gâchés en palabres sur la Charte, une société âprement divisée, des déchirements sans nom, des amitiés brisées, les ponts rompus avec notre plus importante communauté immigrante, le retour du vieil antisémitisme désormais caché sous le paravent de la laïcité…

Et pour finir, ce mois de campagne où le discours xénophobe a atteint des sommets avec les sorties de Janette Bertrand et de la candidate Louise Mailloux, le pire étant l’odieuse complaisance de tous les ténors péquistes, de Pauline Marois au premier chef, envers ces égarements dont ils ne se sont jamais dissociés.

Tout ça pour ça ? Le Québec sort moralement exsangue de ces mois d’enfer auxquels l’a soumis un parti qui, pour de purs motifs électoraux (et pour paver la voie à un troisième référendum), a exploité l’insécurité culturelle d’une partie de la population en diabolisant des minorités religieuses auxquelles on a collé l’infâme étiquette d’ « intégristes ».

Le débarquement tumultueux de PKP dans la campagne a fait dérailler le plan des stratèges péquistes, mais le plan était là, planifié de longue date, terriblement transparent : faire campagne sur le dos des minorités. On a rarement vu, dans nos vieilles démocraties, un plan de campagne plus déshonorant.

Rien d’étonnant à ce que des indépendantistes ulcérés, comme ceux du Québec inclusif, s’apprêtent à voter Québec solidaire, au risque de devenir les alliés objectifs des libéraux. Le débat sur la Charte, en effet, touchait à des valeurs extrêmement profondes – d’un côté le culte sincère, mais irrationnel, de la laïcité à la française, de l’autre le respect des libertés individuelles, fondements de notre démocratie libérale.

Ce sont là des valeurs qui vont au-delà des lignes partisanes et même des opinions qu’on peut avoir sur la question nationale. Il s’agissait de savoir dans quelle sorte de société nous voulons vivre.

Dans la panique d’une fin de campagne éprouvante, Mme Marois y est allée de ses propres improvisations sur le sujet. La période de transition pour les employés rétifs ? Elle « pourrait dans certains cas peut-être être un petit peu allongée s’il y a lieu ». Dans certains cas, peut-être, s’il y a lieu… bonjour la confusion !

Sur les employés qui seraient congédiés en vertu de la loi sur la Charte : nous les aiderons à se réorienter dans le secteur privé, de dire Mme Marois avec une sollicitude toute maternelle.

Mais comment recycler le chirurgien qui tient à sa kippa (comme c’est le cas de tous les juifs orthodoxes) ? Il va opérer où, le docteur, s’il est exclu des hôpitaux ? Et l’infirmière ? Et l’éducatrice de garderie ? Et le prof d’université ? En plus, l’espace est verrouillé, car même les entreprises privées, pour peu qu’elles fassent affaire avec le gouvernement, tomberaient sous le coup de la loi.

Est-ce par hasard que le PQ a envoyé ses quatre candidates d’origine maghrébine – des femmes que le parti a abondamment utilisées pendant le débat sur la Charte – dans des circonscriptions libérales, pour ainsi dire à l’abattoir ?

Evelyne Abitbol, dans Acadie (qui a réélu avec 11 000 voix de majorité la libérale Christine St-Pierre en 2012) ; Yasmina Chouakri, dans Anjou (3000 voix de majorité au PLQ en 2012) ; Leila Mahiout, dans Bourassa-Sauvé (7000 voix de majorité au PLQ en 2012).

Quant à Djemila Benhabib, elle a été cavalièrement expulsée de Trois-Rivières, où elle comptait se représenter après s’être installée avec mari et enfant dans la circonscription, au profit d’Alexis Deschênes, un nouveau venu en politique. Mme Benhabib a été expédiée dans Mille-Îles, une circonscription qui vote libéral depuis 2003.

Voilà comment le PQ a remercié ces femmes qui ont rompu avec leur communauté pour se faire les thuriféraires de la Charte.


Posted via Blogaway